Should You Charge For Your Minimum Viable Product?

creditcard2.jpg

Ash Maurya is the Founder of WiredReach, which is behind the bootstrapped startup Cloudfire. This post originally appeared on Venture Hacks; it is republished here with permission.

What you charge for your product is simultaneously one of the most complicated and most important things to get right. Not only does your pricing model keep you in business, it also signals your branding and positioning. And it%u2019s harder to iterate on pricing than other elements of your business. Once you set a price, coming down is usually easier than going up.

Should I charge for my MVP?

Most people choose to defer the %u201Cpricing question%u201D because they don%u2019t think they (or the product) are ready. Something I hear a lot is that a minimum viable product is by definition (embarrassingly) minimal. How can you possibly charge for it?

A minimal product is not synonymous with a half-baked or buggy product. If you%u2019ve followed a customer development process, your MVP should address the top 3 problems customers have identified as important and it should do it well. You can ensure that by dedicating 80% of your efforts to improving existing features versus cranking out new ones.

Some good insights into pricing structure and how this one SaaS evolved their pricing. If you haven’t run into Ash Maurya before, I would recommend reading more of his posts.

ScreenToaster – Online screen recorder. Capture screencasts instantly.

This is a simple way of making and sharing screencasts to show off your latest wares. It could be a good way of quickly creating an example if you are trying to support someone instead of going through the extra upload steps with other services.

RightSide Capital Announces New Seed Fund; Will Make 100-200 Investments Per Year

Media_httpwwwmobilecr_izsgy

This is an interesting post on a new type of start-up investor:

RightSide explicitly claims on their website that they do not care about $100M exits. They are fine with a large number of $10-50M exits. The irony pervaded the room when Mike Maples later gave a speech on investing only in Thunder Lizards at the same event. Mike Maples proclaimed that he only wants to do 10 investments a year, and often makes his decision on investing within the first 30 min of talking to an entrepreneur. RightSide seems to balk at that philosophy, and seems to believe that identifying Thunder Lizards requires more luck than skill. Their website proudly proclaims: “Suspicious of ‘Gut Feel’”.

Read the rest at the link above.