Lessons Learned: Learning is better than optimization (the local maximum problem)

Learning is better than optimization (the local maximum problem)

Lean startups don’t optimize. At least, not in the traditional sense of trying to squeeze every tenth of a point out of a conversion metric or landing page. Instead, we try to accelerate with respect to validated learning about customers.

For example, I’m a big believer in split-testing. Many optimizers are in favor of split-testing, too: direct marketers, landing page and SEO experts — heck even the Google Website Optimizer team. But our interest in the tactic of split-testing is only superficially similar.

Take the infamous “41 shades of blue” split-test. I understand and respect why optimizers want to do tests like that. There are often counter-intuitive changes in customer behavior that depend on little details. In fact, the curse of product development is that sometimes small things make a huge difference and sometimes huge things make no difference. Split-testing is great for figuring out which is which.

Another excellent post by Eric Ries about how there is a need to balance metric testing with reasonable design sense to overcome getting stuck in a particular direction.

© StartupsHK. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit AND link of actual article is given to StartupsHK with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.