I know there are similar sites to this out there. This one was recommended by someone that is on a list I follow, had a good experience with them.
Many startups don’t have the design chops in house, so resources like this can be quite useful.
I know there are similar sites to this out there. This one was recommended by someone that is on a list I follow, had a good experience with them.
Many startups don’t have the design chops in house, so resources like this can be quite useful.
I came across this feed of posts by Dave at a Seed Funding panel at the Founders Fund. It is a good summary of several incubators and seed level funds, including the amount invested and what that investment carries with it. It is a bit difficult to find the concise thread on Twitter, so just reposting it here to make it easier to parse.
#FOF Incubator Panel 32 minutes ago from TweetDeck
#FoF @davidcohen: “the scarce resource in incubators these days isn’t $25K… it’s [good] mentorship”41 minutes ago from TweetDeck
#FoF @TheFunded: “when i was a young man at IdeaLab, we had to walk 5 miles uphill to school (BOTH WAYS!)”… 😉42 minutes ago from TweetDeck
#FoF @TheFunded : “I don’t need to make money… i just want more rainbows & unicorns!”about 1 hour ago from TweetDeck
#FoF @davidcohen: #TechStars exits: SocialThing (AOL), IntenseDebate (Automattic), BrightKite (Limbo), FilterBox (Jive)about 1 hour ago from TweetDeck
#FoF @TheFunded “170 companies enrolled in Founders Institute, so far we have 41 graduates”about 1 hour ago from TweetDeck
#FoF @rsohoni “for #seedcamp, we like to make expert svc providers avail but leave it to entrepreneurs to make decisions”about 1 hour ago from TweetDeck
#FoF quotable @TheFunded “most commercial real estate incubators are douchebags… at 30% vacancy rates, lots of folks are incubators”about 1 hour ago from TweetDeck
#FoF @TheFunded:Founders Institute did ~40 last year, aiming for hundreds this year (feeder to other incubator programs)about 1 hour ago from TweetDeck
#FoF @TechStars does 30 startups / yr (3 cities); @seedcamp 10/yr (moving to 15/yr); @bootuplabs does 6-8 /yrabout 1 hour ago from TweetDeck
#FoF @rsohoni EU-based incubator @seedcampinvests 30K-50K Euros (~$50-80K USD) for 5-10% preferredabout 1 hour ago from TweetDeck
#FoF @dannyrobinson says @bootuplabs uses $150K conv note w/ $850K cap (founders must take $50K; rmng $100K at founder optn)about 1 hour ago from TweetDeck
#FoF @dannyrobinson saying that @Techstarsreally investing more like $30-50K if you count services / facility etcabout 1 hour ago from TweetDeck
#FoF quote @davidcohen: “@Techstars works best in places w/ chip on its shouldr” (transltn: we’re not in Silicon Valley 😉about 1 hours ago from TweetDeck
#FoF @davidcohen @Techstars puts in $6K per founder (max $18K) in exchange for ~6% commonabout 1 hours ago from TweetDeck
After the Techcrunch Bump
I see many consumer Internet pitches these days where the basic marketing strategy is to (1) get covered by Techcrunch, (2) get tens of thousands of users from the “Techcrunch Bump”, and then (3) “grow virally”. While a positive Techcrunch review has the potential to send thousands of consumers your way, it does not represent a marketing plan. Munjal Shah at Riya found this out after the launch of Riya back in 2006, when he wrote about “the cocaine like high and subsequent crash of the Techcrunch effect”:
The Techcrunch article got put on Digg and read in thousands of feed readers and viola… the Techcrunch effect begins. Michael’s blog is the single more effective vehicle to get the word to the online blogosphere about new technology companies on the planet..The unfortunate fact was that the initial hammering [our servers] took was just not the reality we would see later. The number of photos uploaded per hour began to fall and then stabilized near the end of the 22nd at around 25,000 photos per hour and would continue to fall for weeks to come. – Munjal Shah
So while a positive reception from the blogging community is valuable — and can generate a lot of initial activity/interest and a nice looking Alexa chart — it is not the only ingredient in your ultimate marketing success. When I see a post-launch consumer Internet startup, I basically look for a few simple things:1) Usage Growth — how many unique users are visiting/engaging with your site and product, and how is the rate of growth evolving over a several week period of time. I also look at the source of this growth — is it scalable, repeatable and systemic? Is it event-driven (ie, PR)? Is it organic or driven by marketing (ie, is the company buying growth via Adwords, etc)?
2) Virality — So many people misunderstand virality. Virality is not “word of mouth”. And having a product go viral is not easy — nor is it something you can just “sprinkle on a product” after creating it.
This post discusses how to look at customer numbers to get a better feel for how the growth is actually going. Interesting read.
Copyright © 2025 · Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in